Comments on: You've Got Mail http://blog.drphil.com/2009/08/01/957/ Dr. Phil- Start A Change Reaction Sun, 19 May 2013 02:33:16 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: Yvette Labbee http://blog.drphil.com/2009/08/01/957/comment-page-3/#comment-15606 Yvette Labbee Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:27:13 +0000 http://blog.drphil.com/?p=957#comment-15606 Dr. Phil, I believe that when Shelley gave birth to the twins by serrogacy she had intended to hand them over to the biological parents. However, once she saw and held them in her arms, she decided that she could not give them up and fabricated an excuse not to do so. If she was so concerned about the biological mother being unfit, these babies should have been turned over to foster parents until she had proof that indeed the mother was fit to care for her children. Shelley and Paul should never have signed their names on the birth certficates. I believe a woman who has worked twenty one years at a job and has never been institutionalized and whose psychiatrist believes that she is fit to have children ,should indeed be given back her children. If you provide six psychiatrists that confirm that the biological mother is indeed fit to care for her children and Shelley has said that it would not change her mind about giving them up, her intent was just that not to give them up in the fist place. Dr. Phil, I believe that when Shelley gave birth to the twins by serrogacy she had intended to hand them over to the biological parents. However, once she saw and held them in her arms, she decided that she could not give them up and fabricated an excuse not to do so. If she was so concerned about the biological mother being unfit, these babies should have been turned over to foster parents until she had proof that indeed the mother was fit to care for her children. Shelley and Paul should never have signed their names on the birth certficates. I believe a woman who has worked twenty one years at a job and has never been institutionalized and whose psychiatrist believes that she is fit to have children ,should indeed be given back her children. If you provide six psychiatrists that confirm that the biological mother is indeed fit to care for her children and Shelley has said that it would not change her mind about giving them up, her intent was just that not to give them up in the fist place.

]]> By: Yvette Labbee http://blog.drphil.com/2009/08/01/957/comment-page-3/#comment-15600 Yvette Labbee Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:24:50 +0000 http://blog.drphil.com/?p=957#comment-15600 Dr. Phil, I believe that when Shelley gave birth to the twins by serrogacy she had intended to hand them over to the biological parents. However, once she saw and held them in her arms, she decided that she could not give them up and fabricated an excuse not to do so. If she was so concerned about the biological mother being unfit, these babies should have been turned over to foster parents until she had proof that indeed the mother was fit to care for her children. Shelley and Paul should never have signed their names on the birth certficates. I believe a woman who has worked twenty one years at a job and has never been institutionalized and whose psychiatrist believes that she is fit to have children ,should indeed be given back her children. If you provide six psychiatrists that confirm that the biological mother is indeed fit to care for her children and Shelley has said that it would not change her mind about giving them up, her intent was just that not to give them up Dr. Phil, I believe that when Shelley gave birth to the twins by serrogacy she had intended to hand them over to the biological parents. However, once she saw and held them in her arms, she decided that she could not give them up and fabricated an excuse not to do so. If she was so concerned about the biological mother being unfit, these babies should have been turned over to foster parents until she had proof that indeed the mother was fit to care for her children. Shelley and Paul should never have signed their names on the birth certficates. I believe a woman who has worked twenty one years at a job and has never been institutionalized and whose psychiatrist believes that she is fit to have children ,should indeed be given back her children. If you provide six psychiatrists that confirm that the biological mother is indeed fit to care for her children and Shelley has said that it would not change her mind about giving them up, her intent was just that not to give them up

]]> By: Russell Vlaanderen. http://blog.drphil.com/2009/08/01/957/comment-page-3/#comment-10489 Russell Vlaanderen. Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:58:54 +0000 http://blog.drphil.com/?p=957#comment-10489 Dear Doctor Phil. Is that the one from America Online. Com? I use to have Http://- AmericaOnline.Com years ago but now I am Http://WWW.Google.Com and I love--- it. Well I had better close now. Sincerley Your. Rusell Vlaanderen.-------------------- Dear Doctor Phil. Is that the one from America Online. Com? I use to have Http://-
AmericaOnline.Com years ago but now I am Http://WWW.Google.Com and I love—
it. Well I had better close now. Sincerley Your. Rusell Vlaanderen.——————–

]]> By: Lorraine Ryan http://blog.drphil.com/2009/08/01/957/comment-page-3/#comment-5825 Lorraine Ryan Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:34:22 +0000 http://blog.drphil.com/?p=957#comment-5825 I agree with the last post by Angie (9/19/09). Even as a teacher myself, I still agree. As of right now, my school district is trying to implement an invasion of its employees' privacy. They are attempting to create a job position where someone directly under the superintendent would be able to go online to see what the employees have posted online. Any employee could be summarily dismissed for having something inappropriate online. It happened in another district within the last 2 weeks. My Facebook page has nothing to do with my performance at work. I should not be put in danger of losing my job based on what is posted on my social networking page. It's as much an invasion of privacy as that teen cheerleader. My teacher union addressed this in a union meeting just yesterday. We were informed that the NJEA legal department is involved in talks with the NJ education commissioner at this point. It's becoming a mess. Dr. Phil has a point about safety. In our union's case though, safety couldn't possibly be the reason. I AM curious though to find out why the district seems to feel it's necessary in the first place. What do they hope to accomplish by creating this position? It's ludicrous. I agree with the last post by Angie (9/19/09). Even as a teacher myself, I still agree. As of right now, my school district is trying to implement an invasion of its employees’ privacy. They are attempting to create a job position where someone directly under the superintendent would be able to go online to see what the employees have posted online. Any employee could be summarily dismissed for having something inappropriate online. It happened in another district within the last 2 weeks. My Facebook page has nothing to do with my performance at work. I should not be put in danger of losing my job based on what is posted on my social networking page. It’s as much an invasion of privacy as that teen cheerleader. My teacher union addressed this in a union meeting just yesterday. We were informed that the NJEA legal department is involved in talks with the NJ education commissioner at this point. It’s becoming a mess. Dr. Phil has a point about safety. In our union’s case though, safety couldn’t possibly be the reason. I AM curious though to find out why the district seems to feel it’s necessary in the first place. What do they hope to accomplish by creating this position? It’s ludicrous.

]]> By: Angie Wantz http://blog.drphil.com/2009/08/01/957/comment-page-3/#comment-3088 Angie Wantz Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:22:10 +0000 http://blog.drphil.com/?p=957#comment-3088 I think that people have the right to vent, even if it is on faceboo. I think this girl is the right and should not even have to hand any information over to anyone. The only time I thnk any information should have been gotten off of anyone's computer is if it is involved in a Police investion and then only then if it pertains to the case they are woring on. People need their privacy and instead of paper journals now days we have the computer. I hope she wins.... I think that people have the right to vent, even if it is on faceboo. I think this girl is the right and should not even have to hand any information over to anyone. The only time I thnk any information should have been gotten off of anyone’s computer is if it is involved in a Police investion and then only then if it pertains to the case they are woring on.

People need their privacy and instead of paper journals now days we have the computer. I hope she wins….

]]> By: Susani Sacca http://blog.drphil.com/2009/08/01/957/comment-page-3/#comment-2410 Susani Sacca Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:54:15 +0000 http://blog.drphil.com/?p=957#comment-2410 DAVID...Sorry I had 2 blogs confused. Washington and This Facebook kid and teacher thing A DOI!~ NOW YOUR post makes perfect sense. I can admit when I am wrong and BOY some of these blogs are making me see stars FOR EXAMPLE The Washington Dc One and totally stupid people on the Breast feeding baby doll one! Sorry please accept my apologies Susani DAVID…Sorry I had 2 blogs confused.

Washington and This Facebook kid and teacher thing A DOI!~

NOW YOUR post makes perfect sense.
I can admit when I am wrong and BOY some of these blogs are making me see stars

FOR EXAMPLE The Washington Dc One and totally stupid people on the Breast feeding baby doll one!
Sorry please accept my apologies
Susani

]]> By: Susani Sacca http://blog.drphil.com/2009/08/01/957/comment-page-3/#comment-2409 Susani Sacca Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:50:31 +0000 http://blog.drphil.com/?p=957#comment-2409 DAVID.... What is a complete joke? An online petition? What peoples views are regarding WASHINGTON, Dc only allowing 1,000,000.00 dollars for the whole USA to have sucide prevention crisis lines? (Maybe) Dr Phil going down and speaking for patients and professionals on this very subject? PLEASE CLARIFY because reading your post and you being a WEB-designer, I totally do not get what your point was and I say this to you sir...with all due respect. Thank you and I await your response. Mrs Susani Sacca DAVID….
What is a complete joke?

An online petition?

What peoples views are regarding WASHINGTON, Dc only allowing 1,000,000.00 dollars for the whole USA to have sucide prevention crisis lines?

(Maybe)

Dr Phil going down and speaking for patients and professionals on this very subject?

PLEASE CLARIFY because reading your post and you being a WEB-designer,

I totally do not get what your point was and I say this to you sir…with all due respect.

Thank you and I await your response.

Mrs Susani Sacca

]]> By: David http://blog.drphil.com/2009/08/01/957/comment-page-3/#comment-2405 David Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:28:48 +0000 http://blog.drphil.com/?p=957#comment-2405 As a Web-designer I think this situation is a complete joke asking for this kind of information is like telling someone to take off their clothes to see if they have stolen something from them. As a Web-designer I think this situation is a complete joke asking for this kind of information is like telling someone to take off their clothes to see if they have stolen something from them.

]]> By: Susani Sacca http://blog.drphil.com/2009/08/01/957/comment-page-3/#comment-2369 Susani Sacca Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:10:41 +0000 http://blog.drphil.com/?p=957#comment-2369 So whats your thoughts now about this DR Phil? Come on catch up on your blogs we are waiting for you.. xox S So whats your thoughts now about this DR Phil?

Come on catch up on your blogs we are waiting for you..
xox
S

]]> By: Noel http://blog.drphil.com/2009/08/01/957/comment-page-3/#comment-2341 Noel Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:40:05 +0000 http://blog.drphil.com/?p=957#comment-2341 I don't know the details of this specific case, but in general, I think it would be appropriate for the teacher/school to bring the matter to the attention of the student's parents and work together WITH the parents in getting to the bottom of the matter. At least, that's where I would start. As well, I think it would be appropriate for the school to be able to randomly monitor anything going through their network (just like in the workplace) and to be up front about it with the students. I don't mean to hack the students' school email, but I think most IT people can actually see where emails are being sent to and from and what internet sites are being browsed, which they should with it being on their network. Obviously I don't know how all that works, but I think you know what I'm trying to get at. Children need to be taught how to browse the internet safely and how to post safely. The schools should be able to protect themselves as well, and students using the internet inappropriately on the school's network should face suitable consequences. I don’t know the details of this specific case, but in general, I think it would be appropriate for the teacher/school to bring the matter to the attention of the student’s parents and work together WITH the parents in getting to the bottom of the matter. At least, that’s where I would start.

As well, I think it would be appropriate for the school to be able to randomly monitor anything going through their network (just like in the workplace) and to be up front about it with the students. I don’t mean to hack the students’ school email, but I think most IT people can actually see where emails are being sent to and from and what internet sites are being browsed, which they should with it being on their network. Obviously I don’t know how all that works, but I think you know what I’m trying to get at.

Children need to be taught how to browse the internet safely and how to post safely. The schools should be able to protect themselves as well, and students using the internet inappropriately on the school’s network should face suitable consequences.

]]>